Aussies taking on too much retirement risk: Daintree Capital

31 August 2018
| By Nicholas Grove |
image
image
expand image

Australians saving for retirement are taking on significantly more risk in their investment portfolio than their global counterparts through a lack of allocation to fixed income securities, according to Daintree Capital.

This is particularly concerning given their income level in retirement is not guaranteed, the boutique investment manager said.

Despite the nation having one of the highest savings rates in the world thanks to its compulsory super system, a closer look at Australian retirement funds revealed they contained on average an almost 50 per cent allocation to equities, significantly higher than other developed nations such as the UK and Canada.

Daintree Capital director Justin Tyler said the heavy weighting to growth assets was driven by Australians’ lack of familiarity with the bond market and their eagerness to take advantage of the Australia’s generous franking credit regime.

However, this resulted in additional volatility and sequencing risks for retirees, he said.

“Equities may be better understood by most investors as an asset class, but fixed income plays an equally important role in a portfolio – one of insurance. The fixed-interest component of a portfolio smooths out negative returns to limit falls in a portfolio’s value when equity markets go south,” Tyler said.

Tyler said research compiled by Daintree Capital showed that a portfolio compiled of 50 per cent ASX 100 shares and 50 per cent an index fund tracking the AusBond Credit FRN Index would have generated around half the volatility of a pure equities portfolio from 2005 to the present day.

“Australian retirement funds on average have just a 14 per cent allocation to bonds, compared to a 22 per cent average in the US and 36 per cent in the UK, so it would seem that those approaching retirement are taking excessive risks with their savings in exposing themselves to the twists and turns of the equity market,” he said.

“This is particularly the case given that Australian retirement savings are made up almost entirely of ‘defined contribution’ style schemes – meaning income in retirement is dependent upon the investment returns generated by the fund, rather than linked to an individual’s working salary as it is in many other markets.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

11 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

11 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

11 months 1 week ago

Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Co...

1 day 13 hours ago

Demand from institutional investors was the main driver of growth in Australia’s responsible investment (RI) market in 2023, as the industry continued to gain momentum....

1 day 13 hours ago

In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges....

1 day 14 hours ago