With the president of the Fair Work Commission (FWC) having flagged he is examining conflicts of interest issues regarding the three-person specialist panel appointed to advise on the selection of default funds, senior officials have confirmed there were 40 applicants for the panel positions.
A Senate Estimates Committee hearing has been told that when the expert panel positions within the FWC were advertised in April last year at the behest of former Workplace Relations and Financial Services minister, Bill Shorten, 40 people had given expressions of interest. The final make-up of the panel was determined by a merit selection panel made up of the group manager of the workplace relations policy group of the former Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations and the chief human capital officer representing the Australian Public Service Commission.
The Senate Committee was also told that the expert panel members were subject to the same rules regarding conflicts of interest as members of the Fair Work Commission .
The chairman of the Senate Committee noted that the president of the FWC, Justice Iain Ross, had written a letter to the Financial Services Council saying that he was considering an expert panel conflict of interest matter.
“.. I think the context of the president’s letter was a possible conflict of interest by two of the expert panel members. These two do hold positions in and receive remuneration from superannuation funds which potentially stand to benefit from decisions of the committee,” the committee chairman said.
APRA’s latest data has revealed that superannuation funds spent $1.3 billion on advice fees, with the vast majority sent to external financial advisers.
Cbus Super has unveiled Advice Essentials Plus, a new service offering affordable financial advice to both members and their partners.
The fund has launched a new tool to help deliver personalised financial education and digital personal advice to eligible members.
The QAR lead reviewer has told a Senate committee that the government’s demands of super funds conflict with their original purpose.