Advice part of key to UK retirement strategies

1 December 2020
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

At the same time as the Australian financial services industry contemplates the Government’s Retirement Income Review (RIR) the UK financial services industry is facing similar decisions in the context of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the retirement income market. 

A report developed by Deloitte’s Centre for Regulatory Strategy has looked at barriers to innovation in the retirement market following the introduction of pension freedoms and has come up with an analysis very similar to that prevailing in Australia, but emphasising the value of people receiving financial advice. 

It said that the introduction of pension freedoms in 2015, coupled with the growth in defined contribution pensions had, on the face of it, crated a compelling market need for product innovation in the UK retirement sector – something which had been heightened by the pandemic. 

One of the key findings of the Deloitte report is that there is a need to consider wealth as a whole rather than pensions in isolated in “both advised and non-advised journeys”. 

“In particular, any comparison between the pension wealth gap and wealth held by many in property highlights a greater potential role for property wealth to support retirement income,” it said.  

“This is likely to create a wider role for specific uses of equity release. It follows that that there would be benefits in the equity release and pension markets operating as a more coherent retirement income market, both within the industry and at a regulatory level.” 

The Deloitte report said that it was generally accepted that there was an “advice gap” in the market. 

“This advice gap is driven by a number of factors, including access (and consumer engagement), cost and the actual and perceived quality of advice,” it said.  

“As a result, consumers are often making complex decisions on a non-advised basis. As consumers tend to follow the path of least resistance at retirement, there is a substantial risk that many of these decisions may prove to be sub-optimal for the individual.” 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Submitted by Steve on Tue, 12/01/2020 - 13:49

The UK system, which has been forced onto Australia, has decimated the number of advisers providing advice in the UK, as it is now doing here. FOFA & Opt Ins have been an epic fail.

Submitted by RGP on Tue, 12/01/2020 - 14:06

As we in, and licensed in, the advice industry have known all along!

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

11 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

11 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

11 months 1 week ago

Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Co...

17 hours 40 minutes ago

Demand from institutional investors was the main driver of growth in Australia’s responsible investment (RI) market in 2023, as the industry continued to gain momentum....

18 hours ago

In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges....

19 hours ago