AIST welcomes prudential guides

7 March 2013
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

The Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST) has welcomed the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority's (APRA's) draft prudential practice guides - with a few exceptions.

In a submission to APRA commenting on practice guide 'SPG 220 Risk Management', AIST called for some best practice examples when it comes to risk appetite statements.

"Best practice examples would be of great assistance to the industry while it develops its competency for expressing risks in this way," said the submission.

However, AIST accepted that risk appetite statements would "evolve and improve over time" - and any examples provided by APRA could be amended as the requirements are embedded into Registrable Superannuation Entity (RSE) licensees' processes.

In regards to the 'SPG 231 Outsourcing', AIST argued that risks associated with outsourcing functions are "borne and managed by the trustee", and should not be the responsibility of the RSE licensee.

'SPG 510 Governance' could be improved by including a recommendation that gender representation on boards be "considered and actioned", according to the submission.

However, when it comes to the requirement to appoint a non-affiliated director as chair of the board, AIST restated its "long-held belief" that there should be no "positive obligations on boards in that regard".

AIST also reiterated its position that non-directors should be able to form part of board committees, where the board decides it is appropriate.

In relation to 'SPG 521 Conflicts of Interest', the submission called for guidance from APRA regarding who the correct person would be to conduct an "annual robust review" of a superannuation fund's conflicts management framework.

Finally, AIST also asked that APRA provide "sufficient flexibility to accommodate relevant factors other than age" when it comes to lifecycle investment strategies.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

11 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

11 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

11 months 1 week ago

Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Co...

1 day 19 hours ago

Demand from institutional investors was the main driver of growth in Australia’s responsible investment (RI) market in 2023, as the industry continued to gain momentum....

1 day 19 hours ago

In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges....

1 day 20 hours ago