APRA may get pre-emptive powers

13 September 2012
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

Amid continuing criticism of both the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission over their handling of the collapse of Trio Capital, the Government has released a public consultation paper dealing with the strengthening of APRA's crisis management powers.

One of the most important elements contained in the consultation paper is a proposal to provide APRA with directions power in superannuation to take pre-emptive action to address prudential concerns, including the removal of trustees, directors or officers.

The consultation paper, released by the Minister for Financial Services and Superannuation, Bill Shorten, also canvasses a range of changes including the ability of the regulator to appoint statutory managers to failing institutions, its capacity to deal with foreign entities and its ability to direct failing institutions to disclose information.

Having suffered criticism in the Parliament over suggestions that the Government failed to appropriately account for the regulatory impacts of its Future of Financial Advice changes, Shorten said the Government was seeking views on the regulatory impact associated with the measures.

"This information will be used in preparation of the Regulatory Impact Statement which the Government needs to consider before deciding which reform options it will develop further," he said.

Analysis of the Treasury discussion paper revealed concerns that while the regulator has comprehensive directions power in relation to banks, general insurers and life insurers, this does not apply to superannuation entities - "even though the superannuation sector holds approximately $1.4 trillion in savings and a number of superannuation entities hold tens of billions of dollars in assets".

"APRA currently does not have a general early intervention tool - of the flexibility of the directions power in the other industries - to address a superannuation entity's deterioration or non-compliance with prudential requirements," the discussion paper said.

It said that while there were certain existing directions powers in superannuation, their specificity limited their utility, and the broadest directions power (a direction to comply with a licence condition) was not pre-emptive.

"Enhancing directions powers in superannuation would allow APRA to detail specifically how an entity must address an identified concern," the discussion paper said.

"Directions powers would enable APRA to direct the entity specifically as to what should be done to remedy the situation, without the need to appoint an acting trustee or institute lengthy criminal proceedings."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

11 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

11 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

11 months 1 week ago

Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Co...

2 days 5 hours ago

Demand from institutional investors was the main driver of growth in Australia’s responsible investment (RI) market in 2023, as the industry continued to gain momentum....

2 days 5 hours ago

In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges....

2 days 6 hours ago