ASFA warns ASIC on PDS issues

10 March 2015
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has been told that rather than seeking to issue new guidance on Product Disclosure Statements (PDSs), the underlying legislation should be changed to ensure consumers received greater clarity around fees and costs.

The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) has filed a highly pointed submission with ASIC arguing that formal legislative and regulatory effort is needed to address longstanding fee disclosure issues.

"ASFA's strongly preferred approach would be for Treasury to undertake a comprehensive review of the intended policy outcomes and legislative provisions, in place of the on-going, piece-meal approach that ASIC has been forced to adopt in order to address the underlying legislative issues," the submission said.

It said the primary purpose of PDS disclosure was to allow consumers to compare products, including direct fees and indirect costs that they might be exposed to.

"The starting point to achieving consistency and accuracy is for clear requirements in the primary legislation and supporting regulation," the ASFA submission said.

It went on to say that it believed the differences in the fee disclosure requirements for superannuation funds and managed funds were unnecessary, did not appear logical and might prove to be counter-productive.

"Applying separate requirements makes it difficult for consumers to compare these products and for product issuers to manage these disclosure obligations efficiently," the submission said. "It is not clear to ASFA what is the policy objective for the differences. As a result of the differences, disclosure practices will diverge rather than achieve a level of consistency that should be the policy objective."

"ASFA is not is not confident that total investment related fees and costs will be disclosed consistently across the industry as a result of these changes," it said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

11 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

11 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

11 months 1 week ago

Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Co...

2 days 2 hours ago

Demand from institutional investors was the main driver of growth in Australia’s responsible investment (RI) market in 2023, as the industry continued to gain momentum....

2 days 2 hours ago

In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges....

2 days 3 hours ago