Default super process a racket: Brogden

16 October 2014
| By Malavika Santhebennur |
image
image
expand image

The former Labor government's legislation where the Fair Work Commission (FWC) should review every super fund in all 122 modern awards and select new funds is not a safety net, but a racket.

Financial Services Council (FSC) CEO John Brogden made the comment in a speech to the National Press Club yesterday, and added the current default super process is anti-competitive and conflicted, and should be scrapped.

Brogden said the Fair Work Commission (FWC) default super process is simply a distribution channel for industry funds, and called it an industry fund "monopoly".

He said the FWC process gives industry funds control over $9 billion in annual flows of default super contributions.

"Why else would industry funds today launch a desperate, farcical and extraordinarily hypocritical proposal to restrict one class of superannuation funds from the opportunity to provide Australians with low cost, high performing retirement funds?" he asked.

"Dictating which super fund employers must use is an insult to the intelligence of every employer in the country."

He also said the FWC process only lets unions and employer organisations lodge submissions into which fund is selected for each award.

Brogden opined the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) is the appropriate body for reviewing MySuper products rather than an industrial arbiter.

He also argued employers should have the freedom to choose from all APRA-approved MySuper products that suits their employees.

In relation to governance, Brogden re-emphasised the need for a majority of independent directors and independent chair on super trustee boards.

"The Fair Work Commission process is a closed shop.

"So long as the Government allows trustee boards to continue with equal representation between unions and employers, and for the FWC to continue to choose default funds at the behest of unions and employers, there will continue to be an untenable conflict of interest," he said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

11 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

11 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

11 months 1 week ago

Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Co...

2 days 11 hours ago

Demand from institutional investors was the main driver of growth in Australia’s responsible investment (RI) market in 2023, as the industry continued to gain momentum....

2 days 11 hours ago

In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges....

2 days 12 hours ago