Define ‘fee’ and ‘cost’ urges ASFA

22 October 2014
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The Government and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) need to clarify the definition of what represents a "fee" and what represents a "cost" in Product Disclosure Statements (PDS), according to the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA).

As well, the superannuation group has used a submission to ASIC on a Draft Class Order on disclosure of fees for superannuation trustees and managed investment scheme responsible entities, to argue that legislative action might be preferable to the issuing of a class order.

"We appreciate the efforts that ASIC is making to clarify the requirements regarding disclosure of fees and costs in PDSs through Class Order modification," the submission said. "However, as we have indicated to ASIC and Treasury in previous submissions and meetings, we consider it critical that the disclosure requirements in the Corporations Regulations 2001 (Corporations Regulations) are themselves revisited as a matter of urgency.

It said that, in particular, ASFA believed there was an urgent need to provide clarity around what is a ‘fee' as opposed to a ‘cost', ensuring that industry is provided with clear definitions and guidelines around the intended definition of each for disclosure purposes.

The submission said the terms ‘fee' and ‘cost' were not defined in the relevant regulatory provisions and that the existing guidance provided by ASIC was example-based rather than definitional.

The submission also pointed to "the difficulties associated with identifying ultimate underlying assets and the costs of interposed vehicles".

It said its concerns around this were similar to concerns raised by the industry in relation to portfolio holdings disclosure, which had been deferred pending further consultation.

"In ASFA's view, the difficulties associated with identifying and disclosing indirect costs warrant the same level of consideration and analysis, to ensure the burden on trustees is balanced with the perceived benefits that would arise from greater transparency," the ASFA submission said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

11 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

11 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

11 months 1 week ago

Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Co...

2 days 2 hours ago

Demand from institutional investors was the main driver of growth in Australia’s responsible investment (RI) market in 2023, as the industry continued to gain momentum....

2 days 2 hours ago

In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges....

2 days 3 hours ago