Employer opt-out unbalanced say AIST

14 August 2012
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

The Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST) says unilateral employer discretion will erode the balance of employer and employee best interests in choosing default funds for awards.

AIST's submission to the Productivity Commission's draft report into default superannuation funds in modern awards has supported the establishment of an expert panel under Fair Work Australia (FWA), but said employers should not be able to opt-out of default arrangements once they had been decided.

"If employer discretion can be exercised without a requirement to notify that choice and without the need to meet an explicit 'member interest' test, then the notion that the award selection process has substance and protects interests becomes worthless," it said.

The Productivity Commission was incorrect to assume employees' and employers' views on the selection of default funds would always converge, according to AIST.

"There may be features of a superannuation fund that may not be seen as desirable by some employers, even though they provide real and direct benefits to employees," the submission said.

AIST said FWA should have the power to create single-issue enterprise agreements that exist side-by-side with other enterprise agreements that apply at the workplace and could replace the "flawed" opt-out clause.

"As well as covering superannuation, such agreements should also identify the parties covered, the nominal term of the agreement, a consultative mechanism and dispute settlement procedures," it said.

AIST said out-sourcing the expert panel was too risky.

The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) in its submission to the Productivity Commission said it was too early to cement default arrangements that made assumptions about MySuper, 

ASFA disputed many of the findings in the report, including the number of 'choice' superannuation members and the average number of superannuation accounts per member. ASFA said most of the complaints to the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal had been regarding the decision of trustees and not their conduct.

ASFA recommended, at a minimum, the merit-based appointment of superannuation fund trustees.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

11 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

11 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

11 months 1 week ago

Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Co...

1 day ago

Demand from institutional investors was the main driver of growth in Australia’s responsible investment (RI) market in 2023, as the industry continued to gain momentum....

1 day ago

In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges....

1 day 1 hour ago