POWERED BY MOMENTUM MEDIA
Government collaboration needed for infrastructure pipeline
Federal and state governments need to work together to provide more clarity around Australia's infrastructure project pipeline, a Centre for Economic Development (CEDA) forum has been told in Sydney.
Australia needed to prioritise investment in infrastructure projects that increased productivity and international competitiveness, Westpac managing director of economics Bill Evans said, but responsibility of funding infrastructure projects currently sat with the states which were in a poor fiscal position.
"At the moment we are relying upon infrastructure investment, putting that responsibility onto very weak government balance sheets — being the states — when we have a very strong federal government balance sheet that could absorb a lot more government debt and could really kick the infrastructure process off," he said.
"We should be taking advantage of the relative borrowing strength and the substantial strength of the balance sheet of the Commonwealth (government) to make direct investments in infrastructure.
Association of Super Funds of Australia (ASFA) chief executive Pauline Vamos agreed, saying the first hurdle was getting all levels of government to work together to provide certainty and clarity over which assets to build, which assets to sell and who would cover the risk.
"Why I think some countries and some states get into trouble when it comes to infrastructure spend [is that] there is a concern that it's for shorter-term political needs rather than long-term economic needs," she said.
Investment from super funds was also limited due to liquidity requirements, Vamos said, although many funds were looking at opportunities within local councils in terms of greenfield assets.
Evans said a perceptional shift regarding debt was also needed.
"What I would argue is that $50 billion would be around about 3 per cent of GDP, and I wouldn't be uncomfortable if Australia's net [debt] to GDP was derived to that degree — if the money was being used to invest in infrastructure projects that have been appropriately analysed in a sensible cost-benefit analysis on an arm's length basis," he said.
But Queensland Investment Corporation director Dr Maurice Newman said although debt wasn't always a bad thing, it could be — and pointed to the National Broadband Network as how governments should not invest in infrastructure.
He said as long as funding was coming from taxpayers, infrastructure financing could not be divorced from political reality.
AUTHOR
Staff Writer
Money Management staff writers are writers who contribute to the website from time to time. If you would like to discuss the content contained within this article please contact us.
Recommended for you
Economists from the big four banks have all predicted the RBA to deliver another rate cut during its July meeting; however, some admit the decision will be a close call.
Morningstar believes there is still further to run with the potential takeover of Insignia Financial even with original bidder Bain Capital walking away.
Insignia Financial has announced the status of the two private equity bidders as due diligence comes to an end.
The future of superannuation policy remains uncertain, with further reforms potentially on the horizon as the Albanese government seeks to curb the use of superannuation as a bequest vehicle.
TOP PERFORMING FUNDS
ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom 465 Calder Road Calder
99.46 3 y p.a(%)
2
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
95.46 3 y p.a(%)
3
Global X 21Shares Bitcoin ETF
78.55 3 y p.a(%)
4
BetaShares Crypto Innovators ETF
50.39 3 y p.a(%)
5
Global X GlobalX FANG+ ETF
47.50 3 y p.a(%)
