The Federal Government has confirmed it will move next year to make the penalties imposed on employers for the late or short payment of the superannuation guarantee more reflective of the level of their breach.
The undertaking has been given by the Assistant Treasurer, Josh Frydenberg in context of a Board of Taxation report which described the current penalty regime faced by employers as being "unnecessarily harsh".
Frydenberg said that the Government intended the changes would take effect from 1 July next year.
The Board of Taxation report said that it considered the "operation of the SG Charge regime is unnecessarily harsh, often with disproportionate outcomes, and very limited discretion by the
[Tax] Commissioner to take into account factors surrounding a late payment".
The report said that despite the original intention of the SG Charge regime, the Board was aware of a number of examples where the application of the law had given rise to "disproportionate interest and administration elements".
It suggested that one possible solution might be to retain the current SG Charge regime but provide a broad discretionary power for the Commissioner to remit SG Charge components.
However the report noted that such a move would require the Commissioner to have a basis on which to remit the components and that such discretions would, in turn, give rise to review or objection rights "which can further complicate and extend the process for employers".
"It is considered to be more efficient for the law to produce the desired outcome in the first instance, rather than the Commissioner exercising discretion," it said.
APRA’s latest data has revealed that superannuation funds spent $1.3 billion on advice fees, with the vast majority sent to external financial advisers.
Cbus Super has unveiled Advice Essentials Plus, a new service offering affordable financial advice to both members and their partners.
The fund has launched a new tool to help deliver personalised financial education and digital personal advice to eligible members.
The QAR lead reviewer has told a Senate committee that the government’s demands of super funds conflict with their original purpose.