Put all options on table for retirement debate: CEDA

1 September 2015
| By Jason |
image
image
expand image

The retirement system in Australia needs to be completely reworked with wholesale changes instead of piece-meal efforts, with issues such as pre-tax mortgage repayments and superannuation being made available for owner-occupied home purchases to be put on the table.

At the same time, the objectives of the retirement system need to be clarified and confirmed which would remove confusion among the public, industry and government, according to the Committee for Economic Development in Australia (CEDA), chief executive, Professor the Hon. Stephen Martin.

"There has been a lot of talk and tweaking of retirement policy aimed at reducing the burden on government, but what Australia needs is a robust discussion on all the options to ensure long term Australians can retire comfortably," Martin said.

"The system needs to be reviewed in its entirety. Ensuring retirement policies are not too onerous on the Federal Budget should be an outcome, but the focus must be on ensuring a sustainable system that delivers an adequate living standard for retirees."

Martin said Australia's ageing population and its' impact on retirement policy has been discussed for many years but the issue sustained housing affordability has only recently come to the fore as a significant issue for retirement policy.

He claimed that if this was not addressed there was the likelihood that more people would be living in poverty in retirement placing more pressure on the Federal Budget.

Martin stated there were a number of options that could reshape retirement policy in Australia and they should all be examined for their merits in the current environment.

"Obviously taxation arrangements need review because currently concessions are benefiting the rich and are being used as tax mitigation measures rather than to encourage retirement savings. However, the other area that needs review is the treatment of the family home," he said.

"One option would be make the family home part of the assets test for the Age Pension and change superannuation payments to an after income tax payment, with all other super tax concessions removed.

"Alternatively, mortgage payments on the family home could be allowed to be made pre-tax.

"Implementing one of these options would allow for two important components of retirement savings — superannuation and the family home — to be treated the same."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

11 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

11 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

11 months 1 week ago

Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Co...

1 day 12 hours ago

Demand from institutional investors was the main driver of growth in Australia’s responsible investment (RI) market in 2023, as the industry continued to gain momentum....

1 day 12 hours ago

In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges....

1 day 13 hours ago