Retirement review too narrow -AIST

1 October 2014
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The Treasury's review of Retirement Income Stream Sustainability is too narrow and should, properly, look at the sustainability of the underlying tax settings, according to the Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST).

The AIST has used its submission to the Treasury inquiry to argue that such an expansion of the inquiry is warranted in circumstances where questions may ultimately arise over whether there is any real advantage in retirement incomes steams over amounts invested in competing non-superannuation investments.

The submission also questioned the sustainability of superannuation restrictions and whether they formed a barrier to retirement savings, and the adequacy of social security arrangements, and "what is accomplished by means testing parity between non-superannuation and superannuation products".

The submission also pointed to the issues associated with longevity risk "as part of a larger basket of financial risks which include greater exploration of investment risks, as well as mortality risk".

The AIST submission said that it believed that there existed no single answer to which type of income stream product would enable retirees to better manage risks in the retirement phase.

The submission also strongly disputed a claim contained in the Treasury paper that "…a defining feature of account-based products is that the holder bears the full extent of the risks— in particular, investment and longevity risks—associated with the product…"

"This is a conclusion upon which most of the discussion in this paper rests," it said.

However the AIST submission said that the conclusion that an investor in an account-based retirement income stream bears the full extent of risks was "erroneous".

"The assumption…that there is a magic product that addresses both longevity risk and the many competing investment risks is fanciful," the submission said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

11 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

11 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

11 months 1 week ago

Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Co...

1 day 9 hours ago

Demand from institutional investors was the main driver of growth in Australia’s responsible investment (RI) market in 2023, as the industry continued to gain momentum....

1 day 9 hours ago

In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges....

1 day 10 hours ago