Institutional investors have it wrong on alternatives

21 June 2011
| By Chris Kennedy |
image
image
expand image

Institutional investors have misunderstood how best to use alternative assets in the wake of issues arising in the sector following the global financial crisis (GFC), according to Advance Asset Management.

“Institutions have got this space completely wrong,” according to Advance head of advance investment solutions Patrick Farrell.

Because they haven’t understood the full characteristics and risks of their assets they haven’t blended it well with their other asset classes, and now they’re moving back into more transparent assets, he said.

But then you start to lose the alternative characteristics you were trying to achieve in the first place, such as diversification of risk premia and returns, he said. Those institutions will be likely to change their portfolios in the space of 12 months, he added.

“They were taking on board a lot of equity risk premium into their portfolios but the transparency aspect probably masked that to some degree,” he said.

Many super funds were taking the alternative assets to the extreme then got caught by the liquidity crisis in the GFC, he said.

“You do need liquidity even as a super fund, if you want to change the way your portfolio is designed to some degree you need to have that liquidity piece in there somewhere.”

To appeal to wholesale investors who are interested in the benefits provided by alternative assets such as hedge funds but still concerned by the liquidity aspect Advance announced a new alternative strategies fund, to be launched in August.

The fund has been formed in partnership with US alternative manager and fund of hedge funds specialist Ramius Alternative Solutions, and is designed in particular to have a high underlying liquidity, Thompson said.

Ramius will assist Advance with manager selection and act as an extension of the Advance investment and operations team, with both sides to have the power of veto over manager selection, he said.

The fund is also designed to be highly transparent and will initially make public the underlying investments, he said. The solution will essentially be a core/satellite approach with as much as 45 per cent of the fund to be invested in cash solutions such as indices and exchange-traded funds, he added.

It will feature a 0.98 per cent flat fee with a 10 per cent annual performance fee, and is aimed at wholesale investors with a minimum investment of $50,000, he said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

11 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

11 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

11 months 1 week ago

Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Co...

1 day 7 hours ago

Demand from institutional investors was the main driver of growth in Australia’s responsible investment (RI) market in 2023, as the industry continued to gain momentum....

1 day 7 hours ago

In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges....

1 day 8 hours ago