There is nothing to stop superannuation funds from directing asset allocations towards so-called “impact investments” but, ultimately, they are only likely to do so if they believe it is in the best interests of their members.
That is the bottom line of an Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) submission responding to a Federal Treasury discussion paper on social impact investing.
The submission has effectively countered suggestions that the sole purpose test might preclude impact investments on the part of superannuation funds, but points out that trustees are likely to take a highly pragmatic approach.
“ASFA considers that the current legislative framework for superannuation funds is not a barrier to superannuation funds investing in impact investments,” the submission said but pointed out that trustees clearly understood that their primary purpose was to “deliver retirement savings to fund members”.
The submission said there were barriers to superannuation funds investing in impact investment assets with some of those barriers relating to the inherent nature of markets that are in the early stages of development.
It said the main barriers to superannuation funds investing in impact investment assets included:
The Australian Retirement Trust is adopting a “healthy level of conservatism” towards the US as the end of the 90-day tariff pause approaches, with “anything possible”.
Uncertainty around tariffs and subdued growth may lead to some short-term constraints in relation to the private credit market, the fund manager has said.
Just three active asset managers are expected to attract net inflows over the coming year, according to Morningstar, with those specialising in fixed income or private markets best positioned to benefit.
Taking a purely passive investment approach is leaving many investors at risk of heightened valuation risks, Allan Gray and Orbis Investments have cautioned.