ASX200 still lag in climate disclosure

11 July 2017
| By Jassmyn |
image
image
expand image

While less than half (44 per cent) of Australia’s largest listed companies have a climate change policy or emissions reduction target, banks lead the way for sustainability reporting, according to a report.

An Australian Council of Superannuation Investors (ACSI) report found that 70 ASX200 companies did not make any climate-related disclosures in 2016.

ACSI’s chief executive, Louise Davidson, said companies needed to rapidly adjust their reporting practices to include climate disclosure.

“Our members have a legitimate need to price climate risk into their investment decisions to ensure they are maximising long-term benefits for their beneficiaries,” she said.

The report found the best performing sectors for sustainability reporting were banking, and energy and utilities, with 86 per cent of companies rated ‘leading’ or ‘detailed’.

Banks were also the best performing sector for climate-related disclosure, with five out of seven banks reporting three key indicators – emissions, a policy, and a target.

ANZ, Commonwealth Bank, Insurance Australia Group, Macquarie Group, NAB, and Westpac were part of the companies that were rated as ‘leading’ for the last four years.

ACSI said most ASX200 companies saw the value in sustainability disclosure with almost all undertaking some reporting, 92 per cent in 2016, compared to 80 per cent in 2009.

Over 50 per cent of the ASX200 now reported to a ‘leading’ or ‘detailed’ standard compared to 19.5 per cent in 2008. A further 85 cents in every dollar invested in the ASX200 flowed to companies that reported to a high standard.

However, 16 ASX200 companies did not undertake any sustainability disclosure in 2016, but this was down from 40 in 2008.

“It’s difficult to understand how these companies think this is acceptable in this day and age, especially since we know some of the non-reporters have appreciable exposures to ESG [environmental, social, and governance] risks,” Davidson said.

The report also found that the depth of disclosure by many companies remained sub-optimal with 42 per cent achieving a ‘basic’ or ‘moderate’ rating.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

11 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

11 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

11 months 1 week ago

Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Co...

1 day 14 hours ago

Demand from institutional investors was the main driver of growth in Australia’s responsible investment (RI) market in 2023, as the industry continued to gain momentum....

1 day 14 hours ago

In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges....

1 day 15 hours ago