Australia bucks best green energy financing model

9 May 2013
| By Staff |
image
image image
expand image

Institutional direct investment has the best potential to bridge the financing needs for renewable energy, according to Climate Policy Initiative (CPI) - but the Australian investment industry may need to consider redesigning pooled investment trusts.  

CPI said there were many renewable energy opportunities for institutional investors, but that super funds’ distinctive risk-and-return characteristics were often mismatched with the price that governments and consumers were willing to pay. 

If the world was to move toward renewable energy, it required a significant amount of low-cost, long-term investment, CPI said. 

Direct investment could resolve one quarter of renewable energy project equity and one half of the related debt required to 2035, according to CPI. However the skill and capital needed to build a specialist direct investment team restricted direct investment to the top 150 institutions worldwide. 

CPI’s study found the Australian market lacked the scale to execute direct investment in renewable energy, but strong interest and an established infrastructure fund sector led it to explore other ways to help finance renewable energy investment. 

Although defined benefit models were more conducive to long-term investments such as infrastructure, CPI found several funds had 25-40 per cent of their portfolio in illiquid assets. 

Additionally, it found Australian super funds had among the highest allocations to infrastructure at about 10 per cent. 

It said the industry should redesign the parameters for pooled investment vehicles. 

CPI found that the experience with pooled investment trusts and renewable energy investment had been mixed, with some institutions concerned with high fees and an uncertain cash flow profile.  

It said better pooled vehicles were needed to create liquidity, increase diversity and reduce transaction costs while maintaining the link to underlying cash flows. 

Interestingly, Industry Funds Management (IFM), the investment arm of 30 not-for-profit funds, established a direct investments team last November to seek out opportunities in the $250-500 million range. The global investment manager has over A$44 billion in assets under management. 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

1 year 10 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

1 year 10 months ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

1 year 10 months ago

The firm has forecast stronger global growth and higher inflation in 2026, signalling that central banks may be nearing the end of their easing cycles....

5 hours ago

Despite ASIC’s scathing review of private credit funds, including concerns around valuation inconsistencies and mixed liquidity practices, the asset class grew 9 per cent...

5 hours ago

The fund has joined forces with Macquarie Asset Management in a USD500 million deal targeting infrastructure-linked businesses across global markets....

5 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND