Institutional investors turn to alternatives

image
image
expand image

Institutional investors have continued to turn to active management and alternative investments to meet long-term return assumptions and diversify portfolio risks in the face of growing volatility, according to survey findings by Natixis Investment Managers.

The survey found that seven in 10 investors found that the addition of alternative was important for diversifying portfolio risk, with another 57 per cent saying that investing in alternatives was necessary to outperform the broader market.

The trend was additionally exacerbated in the Asia Pacific market where institutions said they were mostly planning to increase their allocation to all alternatives, such as private equity, real estate investment trusts (REITs), and real estate and infrastructure.

Furthermore, 74 per cent of those investors admitted that the potential returns of illiquid investments were worth the risk.

The survey, which examined about 500 institutional investors around the world, also asked institutional investors to match the best alternative strategies with specific portfolio objectives, who indicated that the best were:

  • Diversification
  • Fixed-income replacement
  • Volatility management
  • Alpha generation; and
  • Inflation hedge.

Natixis’ Australian chief executive, Damon Hambly, said: “As allocations decline for the third consecutive year, investors are questioning the benefits of passive strategies, with nearly 60 per cent saying passing investing artificially suppresses volatility and distort relative stock prices, 57 per cent fearing it creates risk/return trade-offs, and 63 per cent believing it increases systemic risks (63 per cent).”

The surveyed investors also said that, according to them, the current market environment was likely to be favourable to active management in 2018.

However, in 2015 the survey found that institutions expected that 43 per cent of total assets would be invested in passive strategies in 2018, but in reality the figure was far lower.

As far as investing in environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues was concerned, five in six institutions said that new approach was needed, with a strong focus on integrating ESG into it.

Dave Goodsell, executive director of Natixis’ Center for Investor Insight, said: “Institutional investors have witnessed the impact of environmental, social and governance events at numerous companies in recent years and watched as stock values declined right along with corporate reputations.”

“Attitudes towards ESG investing are changing dramatically, with the vast majority of institutions now saying that ESG leads to alpha generation and will become standard practice in less than five years.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

11 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

11 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

11 months 1 week ago

Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Co...

1 day 11 hours ago

Demand from institutional investors was the main driver of growth in Australia’s responsible investment (RI) market in 2023, as the industry continued to gain momentum....

1 day 11 hours ago

In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges....

1 day 12 hours ago