Should super targets be lower?

6 September 2019
| By Jassmyn |
image
image
expand image

Investment experts, including superannuation funds, are not considering the impact of the mounting global economic crisis when creating investment targets and forecasts, Rice Warner believes.

In an analysis, the research house questioned whether the last 10 years of positive returns for mainstream funds had made funds complacent even though the risk of a downturn was now much higher.

“The median estimates for Australian equities have varied from 7.6% to 8.2% a year over the next decade, which is a narrow range.  Hedged international equities have been slightly lower (higher taxes and no franking credits), with a similar narrow range of 7.0% to 7.7%,” it said.

“Surprisingly, government bonds have also been in a narrow range (2.75% increasing to 3.5% in 2019 survey) and cash is flat at 3% to 3.3%, even though interest rates have moved considerably down over the last four years.”

It said these narrow ranges showed that investment experts were sticking to conventional forecasts of future performance and not building in global economic crises impact.

“Should funds be telling members that they are likely to average returns of 5% over the next decade, rather than the 7% to which members have become accustomed?” it said.

“Should the targets be reset lower in an environment of extremely high real asset prices and a decline in world growth (and future profitability)? Should we consider whether 10 years of ‘lower-for-longer’ has expanded to permanently lower interest rates, and a different normal state?”

Rice Warner said baby-boomers who were gradually transitioning into retirement would be the most affected. While retirees now were drawing the minimum pension of 5% up to age 75 when their fund was earning 7%, this would not be the case for those retiring now.

“Fund communications, including retirement calculators, need to show the impact of potentially worse outcomes relative to the past.  Consequently, more members will need to draw down their capital earlier,” it said.

Rice Warner noted that super funds needed to prepare members for much lower nominal returns in a low interest rate and inflation environment and tolerating higher levels of volatility if they were to have a reasonable change of achieving adequate long-term returns.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

11 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

11 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

11 months 1 week ago

Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Co...

3 days 8 hours ago

Demand from institutional investors was the main driver of growth in Australia’s responsible investment (RI) market in 2023, as the industry continued to gain momentum....

3 days 8 hours ago

In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges....

3 days 9 hours ago