Super funds ignoring climate change risk legal action

3 August 2017
| By Jassmyn |
image
image
expand image

Most (82 per cent) of the country’s largest superannuation funds have provided inadequate or no tangible evidence they have considered climate risk in their investment portfolios, according to Market Forces.

Market Forces analyst, Daniel Gocher, said Australian regulators had made it clear that super funds needed to assess climate risk.

“Since this has largely fallen on deaf ears, it’s no surprise that trustees now find themselves open to legal action for a dereliction of basic fiduciary duty,” he said.

“…It is extraordinary that more than 80 per cent of Australia’s super funds have still failed to disclose how they are managing an issue that APRA [Australian Prudential Regulation Authority] has singled out as an immediate, material, financial risk.”

The firm commissioned a memorandum of opinion from Noel Hutley SC and James Mack seeing the breadth of super fund trustees duties and climate risk. The memorandum said the failure by super funds put trustee directors “at risk of breaching their duty to members, and as such, vulnerable to legal action”.

“Billions of dollars of Australian retirement savings are at stake from the physical and transition risks of climate change. The funds that are considering climate risk would be doing right by their members to disclose it,” Gocher said.

“As for the funds that are ignoring climate risk – if the warning signs from regulators haven’t jolted trustees into action, perhaps the realisation of legal liability will.”

Market Forces’ latest analysis also found that:

  • 60 funds disclosed no tangible evidence they had considered the impact of climate risk on their investment portfolios; these funds were responsible for over $393 billion or 29.2 per cent of all large superannuation fund assets and 8.8 million member accounts;
  • 22 funds disclosed inadequate evidence they had considered climate risk ($306 billion or 22.8 per cent of large superannuation fund assets and 5.2 million member accounts);
  • 18 funds disclosed adequate evidence that they had considered climate risk ($646 billion or 48 per cent of large superannuation fund assets and 12.4 million member accounts); and
  • Just eight funds provided regular updates or research to members on climate risk; even those funds that provided ‘adequate’ disclosure published limited regular updates or company/investment specific information.
Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

11 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

11 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

11 months 1 week ago

Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Co...

1 day 13 hours ago

Demand from institutional investors was the main driver of growth in Australia’s responsible investment (RI) market in 2023, as the industry continued to gain momentum....

1 day 13 hours ago

In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges....

1 day 14 hours ago