Additional scrutiny needed for group life policies

5 February 2019
| By Oksana Patron |
image
image
expand image

The Royal Commission’s (RC) final report has advised on additional scrutiny for registrable superannuation entity (RSE) licensees that engage a related party to provide group life insurance, or who enter into a contract with a life insurer.

Under this recommendation, licensees would be required to obtain and provide to the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) independent certification that the arrangements and policies entered were in the best interest of members and would need to satisfy legal and regulatory requirements as well as demonstrate how they would meet the expectations of SPS 250.

Additionally, Commissioner Hayne stressed that the requirement for independent certification would reinforce to RSE licensees “the paramountcy of member’s interests and give members comfort that the arrangements are appropriate”.

“I have set out elsewhere in this report my concerns a about the conflicts that arise where related parties are engaged. These concerns have equal force in the context of group life insurance,” Hayne said in the report.

“Entities that elect to integrate their businesses do so, overwhelmingly, for their own reasons.”

He also stressed that those entities were typically motivated by attempts to increase their market share, revenue and profit and place commercial pressure on their competitors, or “some combination of those factors.”

“That is not to deny the benefits may ultimately flow to consumers from the integrated arrangement. But because the motivation of the integration is, ordinarily, a self-interested one, the congruence of the arrangement with the duty to act in the interests of the other must be closely examined.”

The recommendations also called for the legislation of universal key definitions, terms and exclusions for default MySuper group life policies.

This would include the review of:

  • The merits of prescribing higher minimum coverage for life insurance than is currently provided by the Superannuation Guarantee (Administration) Regulations;
  • The merits of prescribing minimum coverage for permanent incapacity insurance;
  • The merits of prescribing maximum coverage for life and/or permanent incapacity insurance; and
  • The merits od prescribing a fixed level of coverage for life and/or permanent incapacity insurance so as to set a standard amount of default insurance across all MySuper products.
Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

11 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

11 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

11 months 1 week ago

Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Co...

1 day 6 hours ago

Demand from institutional investors was the main driver of growth in Australia’s responsible investment (RI) market in 2023, as the industry continued to gain momentum....

1 day 6 hours ago

In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges....

1 day 7 hours ago