ASIC to issue notices to 50 super trustees

16 March 2017
| By Patrick Buncsi |
image
image
expand image

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) will soon issue notices to nearly 50 superannuation trustees to investigate their insurance arrangements, including timeframes, claims and complaints resolution, as well as details about their incentives schemes, such as premium rebates.

Speaking at Super Review's sister publication Money Management’s Life Insurance Claims Handling Breakfast today, ASIC deputy chair, Peter Kell, said the issuance would also provide ASIC “high level data around insurance in super” – a boon for the data-hungry regulator.

Kell said he expected that a smaller number of trustees would be selected for a further detailed review once ASIC had completed its analysis of this “higher level data”.

Off the back of last year’s industry review, ASIC had been seeking to address specific concerns around complaints handling and disclosure practices, as well as potential conflicts of interest arising from incentives schemes.

“Our work in this area comes partly from last year’s review, but also from some work we’ve been looking at on member experience in super and effective disclosure,” Kell said.

“We’ve found that there were vulnerabilities for consumers in relation to their insurance in super, particularly around changes to cover or where cover ceases.”

ASIC was particularly conscious of the constant changes that could affect member policies, often without the active consent or awareness of the consumer.

“We found that disclosure of insurance can be improved [by] making sure product disclosure statements [PDS] match policy documents, and that all other material the trustee may have about insurance lines up as well,” he said.

According to Kell, there was a clear need for superannuation providers to improve disclosure throughout the complaints handling process, particularly as members were often unaware of changes or how they can effectively address complaints.

“We’ve found too often that it’s… very difficult for [members] to understand the next steps they can take if they are concerned about a claim being denied or, indeed, who [should] take ownership of that communication,” he said.

In these instances, Kell believed it was trustees that did not make it clear whether consumers were required to go through internal dispute resolution channels before taking their claim up with the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal.

 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

11 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

11 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

11 months 1 week ago

Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Co...

23 hours ago

Demand from institutional investors was the main driver of growth in Australia’s responsible investment (RI) market in 2023, as the industry continued to gain momentum....

23 hours ago

In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges....

1 day ago