The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has commenced civil penalty proceedings in the Federal Court against MLC Life Insurance for insurance policy and service failures resulting from poor systems and controls.
ASIC claimed that MLC Life’s failure to implement appropriate systems and controls resulted in unpaid insurance benefits, premiums being charged without notice and underpaid refunds.
It was alleged MLC Life’s conduct led to over $17.5 million in financial harm to over 260,000 customers.
ASIC alleged that from 1999 to November 2020, MLC Life failed to:
ASIC claims that MLC Life breached its obligations as a financial services provider and its duty to act with the utmost good faith when handling claims. ASIC is seeking declarations, pecuniary penalties and other relief from the Federal Court.
ASIC noted poor claims handling and the failure of life insurers to update medical definitions in their insurance policies to accord with current medical practice were both issues considered by the Royal Commission.
MLC Life had advised ASIC that it had remediated customers impacted by the alleged conduct.
Sarah Court, ASIC deputy chair, said consumers should be able to trust insurers to pay their full benefit in times of need and keep them informed about significant changes to their policies.
“This case alleges failures by MLC, over many years, to ensure a reliable delivery of basic and everyday insurance services,” Court said.
“Insurers need to make sure they have adequate systems and controls to manage risk and administer their insurance policies correctly.
“Too often, we are seeing consumers harmed by implementation issues, legacy IT systems and failures resulting from poor governance and culture. ASIC will look to take enforcement action to ensure these systems improve.”
The date for the first case management hearing is yet to be scheduled by the Court.
The insurance company has joined this year’s awards as a principal partner.
The $135 billion fund has transitioned away from TAL Life Insurance following an “extensive tender process”.
The $80 billion fund is facing legal action over allegedly signing up new members to income protection insurance by default without active member consent.
In a Senate submission, the Financial Services Council has once again called for further clarification that the government will assess the consumer outcomes of group insurance against the enshrined objective of superannuation.