Claim information could indicate proportion in ‘dangerous occupation’

21 January 2020
| By Jassmyn |
image
image
expand image

Superannuation funds could use past claim information to provide an indication of the proportion of members that fall under the ‘dangerous occupation’ category in the lead up to the commencement of the putting members’ interest first act, according to Rice Warner.

In an analysis, the research house said one of the challenges for funds when the Treasury Laws Amendment Putting Members’ Interests First (PMIF) Act 2019, is implemented on 1 April, 2020, would be to assess the impact of having, or not having, the dangerous occupation exemption on its membership.

While the first step was to find out how many members a fund had in dangerous occupations, the biggest hurdle was the lack of information.

Rice Warner said funds often did not know members’ occupations until claim time but that this could be useful to give an indication of what proportion was in a dangerous occupation.

“Even though the cohort of claimants may not necessarily be representative of a fund’s total insured membership, it can provide an indication of how many past claimants with a dangerous occupation would not have default cover post-PMIF.  This proportion will vary from fund to fund,” it said.

Rice Warner also said other key considerations for the new rules were the availability of the information, the ease of explanation and administration as well as the risk involved.

“There are potentially many different options open to a trustee which could give different outcomes not only for the cover provided to the individuals impacted but also to the cost of cover for all members,” it said.

“Some of the considerations include the actual date that cover starts, the date of measurement of at work status, use of exclusions and any need for SG contributions to be received.”

Rice Warner noted that members could be left confused and unaware of whether they had cover and what terms applied.

“Providing clear wording and visual illustrations can make communication simpler. It will be a challenge for most funds to think through and develop these eligibility rules and pathways of obtaining cover to ensure the rules are as exhaustive as possible, capturing the various scenarios a member can be in,” it said.

It said that trustees also had to consider their responsibilities under Prudential Standard SPS 250 Insurance in Superannuation (SPS250) which was due to be amended from 1 July, 2020.

“One of the proposed new requirements is that a status attributed to a beneficiary in connection with the provision of insurance must be fair and reasonable,” Rice Warner said.

“It would therefore be prudent for trustees to consider how the new requirements could impact changes being made to accommodate PMIF.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

11 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

11 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

11 months 1 week ago

Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Co...

1 day 11 hours ago

Demand from institutional investors was the main driver of growth in Australia’s responsible investment (RI) market in 2023, as the industry continued to gain momentum....

1 day 11 hours ago

In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges....

1 day 12 hours ago