With the group life sector grappling with balance sheet issues and premium increases, actuarial consultancy, Rice Warner, has produced a report based on five years' of claims which it believes provides key insights, including the degree to which claims handling practices can impact overall outcomes.
Rice Warner's Australian Group Risk Report points to a direct correlation between claims waiting periods and a person's capacity to return to work faster.
Confirming the findings of a recent Super Review panel on problems impacting the life/risk industry, the Rice Warner research found that waiting periods had a significant impact on Income Protection return to work practices.
It found there was a 68 per cent higher chance that a claimant on a 30-day waiting period would not be on claim within 12 months, compared to a claimant on a 90-day waiting period
The statistics also showed how long-term income protection claimants who notified within the first six months were more than 40 per cent more likely to return to work within a year, compared to claimants reporting their disability in the second six months.
Rice Warner outlined the other key findings of its report as being:
Occupations affect claim reporting delays: the delay for hazardous occupations is 60 percent higher than that for professional occupations.
Waiting period has a significant impact on Income Protection return to work statistics. There is a 68 percent higher chance that a claimant on a 30-day waiting period will not be on claim within 12 months, compared to a claimant on a 90-day waiting period.
For TPD claims, musculoskeletal claims represent approximately a third of all claims for all members (excluding younger ages, where accidents/poisons/crimes are the highest), and are at least twice as likely to be the cause of claim than from any other claim type. Mental/stress claims peak at over 20 percent of all claims for members aged 30 to 39, the highest proportion for any age band.
Mental/stress claims feature as the most common Income Protection claim cause for middle aged people, and musculoskeletal claims are prominent among members over age 50.
The insurance company has joined this year’s awards as a principal partner.
The $135 billion fund has transitioned away from TAL Life Insurance following an “extensive tender process”.
The $80 billion fund is facing legal action over allegedly signing up new members to income protection insurance by default without active member consent.
In a Senate submission, the Financial Services Council has once again called for further clarification that the government will assess the consumer outcomes of group insurance against the enshrined objective of superannuation.