ClearView decides not to repay JobKeeper

5 August 2021
| By Jassmyn |
image
image
expand image

ClearView has decided not to repay JobKeeper after it was pressed by a Parliamentary committee to have its board consider it, given its profit margins.

Last month, Labor’s Dr Andrew Leigh asked ClearViews chief executive, Simon Swanson whether the insurer would repay $2.4 million in JobKeeper after its profits did not tangibly fall during the 2020 calendar year.

In an answer to the question on notice, ClearView said its board had considered repaying JobKeeper after looking at its 2020 calendar year profits as requested by the committee despite it usually reporting on a financial year basis.

It said its net profit after tax (NPAT) during 2020 declined from $22.1 million to $17.5 million.

“The board has taken these factors into account and the competing risks and benefits, and considers that accessing the JobKeeper entitlement was the right thing to do by policyholders and employees. Given the circumstances outlined above it is not appropriate to repay these funds,” ClearView said.

ClearView said its board considered:

  • The nature of the company’s operations compared to, for example, the high-volume retail businesses raised as examples in the committee hearing. In a life insurance business, a pandemic is considered a critical financial risk and this uncertainty is continuing;
  • The over-riding importance for a life insurer is to protect policyholder interests over the long-term, this requires a sustainable balance between policyholders and shareholders and their respective interests. During COVID-19 ClearView waived premiums of $4.6 million for over 1,700 customers;
  • JobKeeper had a positive impact on employment and business continuity during 2020 and played a role in assisting the company to deal with the ongoing ramifications and uncertainties of the pandemic; and
  • Being a life insurer, profitability was a secondary factor particularly during a pandemic. Capital adequacy is the cornerstone of a life insurance company as it underpinned its ability to pay claims.
Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

11 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

11 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

11 months 1 week ago

Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Co...

1 day 6 hours ago

Demand from institutional investors was the main driver of growth in Australia’s responsible investment (RI) market in 2023, as the industry continued to gain momentum....

1 day 6 hours ago

In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges....

1 day 7 hours ago