Employer insurance could breach concessional caps

13 April 2017
| By Jassmyn |
image
image
expand image

Employer insurance arrangements may cause superannuation concessional caps to be breached after the maximum concessional cap is reduced to $25,000 on 1 July, according to Rice Warner.

In an analysis, the research house found generous contribution levels, above minimum super guarantee retirements, and/or generous employer-funded insurance benefits provided to employees within a super fund from some employers may be causing caps to be breached.

“Insurance benefits are concessionally taxed as superannuation benefits.  Some employers choose to provide benefits via a superannuation fund for ease of administration,” the analysis said.

“However, because the premiums are treated as employer superannuation contributions they count towards an employee’s concessional contribution cap of $25,000 per annum.”

Rice Warner said for many employees, insurance premiums would be low and the individual would not be aiming to maximise their concessional contributions. However, it could be a very different situation for those nearing retirement age and aiming to salary sacrifice additional contributions.

“The concessional cap can be breached even if the employee makes no salary sacrifice contributions to superannuation. The situation can be even worse for the older employees, especially those with IP cover, as insurance premium rates increase significantly above age 50,” Rice Warner said.

“For these more highly paid employees, the additional 15 per cent tax on superannuation contributions for those with adjusted taxable incomes (for many people salary plus employer superannuation contribution plus any fringe benefits) over $250,000 must also be taken into account.”

Rice Warner noted that even if concessional caps were breached, the employer could continue to pay for cover, with the excess above the cap being taxed at maximum marginal rates and then treated as non-concessional contributions.

“Importantly, ensure that benefits and possible implications for employees are being communicated adequately, encouraging employees to consult a financial adviser who can take account of their total financial position and explain it to them,” it said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

11 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

11 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

11 months 1 week ago

Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Co...

1 day 2 hours ago

Demand from institutional investors was the main driver of growth in Australia’s responsible investment (RI) market in 2023, as the industry continued to gain momentum....

1 day 2 hours ago

In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges....

1 day 3 hours ago