Superannuation fund members receiving default insurance that they do not need are in the minority reinforcing that insurance within superannuation represents a key offering, according to Mercer.
Mercer has told the Productivity Commission (PC) inquiry into the Efficiency and Competitiveness of Superannuation that while the compulsory provision of insurance within superannuation is not perfect, it means that millions of Australians now have better death and disability insurance than they would have had if there had been no insurance cover within super.
“Despite the extensive member coverage provided through superannuation funds, underinsurance remains a much bigger problem than over insurance,” the Mercer submission said. “However, we acknowledge that there is a minority of members, particularly younger members, who are provided with default cover they may not need.”
It said death and disability cover within super had a number of advantages over death and disability cover provided outside super, including:
“The fact that insurance cover within super is on an opt-out basis rather than an opt-in basis facilitates these attractive premium rates and automatic cover levels,” the Mercer submission said. “Therefore, we believe any approach to default fund selection should recognise the value of insurance and take into account the contrasting prices and benefits provided by insurance from different MySuper products, notwithstanding the fact that this makes comparisons more difficult.”
“We recognise there are significant differences in the prices and types of insurance provided by different MySuper products,” it said. “However, the exclusion of this significant benefit from the evaluation of default MySuper products would represent a major omission. The resulting outcome could be that some default members do not have death and disability insurance where they need it, while others are paying premiums that are higher.”
The insurance company has joined this year’s awards as a principal partner.
The $135 billion fund has transitioned away from TAL Life Insurance following an “extensive tender process”.
The $80 billion fund is facing legal action over allegedly signing up new members to income protection insurance by default without active member consent.
In a Senate submission, the Financial Services Council has once again called for further clarification that the government will assess the consumer outcomes of group insurance against the enshrined objective of superannuation.