Insurer stumbles on TPD definition

15 September 2016
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

An insurer's use of an old total and permanent disability (TPD) policy definition has seen it directed by the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal (SCT) to review its decision to reject a member claim.

The SCT ordered both the insurer and the superannuation fund to review their rejection of a member's TPD claim on the basis of the insurer having used an old definition deemed to be less beneficial to the member.

The key difference was that the old definition of TPD was that the complainant needed to be deemed "unable ever again to work for reward in any business, occupation or regular duties for which she is reasonably qualified by education, training and experience", while the more appropriate new definition was that she was "unlikely ever again to work for reward in any business, occupation or regular duties for which he or she is reasonably qualified by education, training or experience".

The SCT pointed out that all of the insurer's assessments (including its submissions to the tribunal), had referred to the old definition and that while the superannuation fund had utilised the new definition, it had not sought to correct the insurer.

"While the tribunal notes that the trustee has assessed the complainant's claim using the ‘unlikely' definition, it has not drawn the insurer's attention to or shown that it has turned its mind to the fact that the insurer has assessed the complainant's claim on the incorrect definition," the SCT determination said.

It said that in the circumstances, "the tribunal considers it appropriate that the insurer and the trustee reconsider the merits of the complainant's claim using the correct ‘unlikely' definition".

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

11 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

11 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

11 months 1 week ago

Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Co...

1 day 23 hours ago

Demand from institutional investors was the main driver of growth in Australia’s responsible investment (RI) market in 2023, as the industry continued to gain momentum....

1 day 23 hours ago

In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges....

2 days ago