Parliamentary scepticism on insurance co-regulation

29 March 2018
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The voluntary approach to industry self-regulation in the life insurance are not working, according to the Parliamentary Committee on Corporations and Financial Services.

The Committee’s report on the Life Insurance industry has expressed a low level of confidence in the co-regulatory approach being pursued by the Financial Services Council (FSC) via its Life Insurance Code of Conduct and the Insurance inside Superannuation Code of Conduct.

“The committee has considered the current self-regulatory approach adopted by the Financial Services Council and the Insurance in Superannuation Working Group,” the report said. “The committee is not persuaded that the current voluntary approaches to industry self-regulation put forward by the Financial Services Council and Insurance in Superannuation Working Group are sufficient to deter misconduct and address the poor practices that have become all too prevalent in the life insurance industry.”

The report said that the committee had also noted that previous self-regulatory codes in the life insurance industry had fallen into disuse.

“The committee considers that it would be unacceptable for such a situation to recur,” it said.

The report said that, in light of this, the committee was persuaded that co-regulation would have greater potential to foster best-practice in the life insurance industry and, as a consequence, help restore much-needed consumer confidence in the sector.

“In particular, the committee considers that, with respect to the life insurance industry, a co-regulatory approach must, at a minimum, deliver a code that:

  • is written in plain English that regulates the conduct of life insurance companies in assessing claims;
  • is mandatory for all industry participants;
  • is registered with ASIC;
  • is enforceable in order to create accountability; and
  •  provides genuine remedies for its breach, including financial remedies,

thereby creating an incentive for compliance.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

11 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

11 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

11 months 1 week ago

Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Co...

1 day 3 hours ago

Demand from institutional investors was the main driver of growth in Australia’s responsible investment (RI) market in 2023, as the industry continued to gain momentum....

1 day 3 hours ago

In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges....

1 day 4 hours ago