SCT keyword clear on TPD

16 June 2016
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

A recent determination by the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal (SCT) has underscored the recent calls by the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) for greater clarity around total and permanent disablement (TPD) definitions.

Dealing with a decision by a superannuation fund and an insurer to deny a former policeman suffering post-traumatic stress a TPD insurance pay-out, the SCT relied heavily on the policy definition to deny the claim.

The former policeman had sought the TPD payout on the basis that he was no longer able to work in law enforcement but acknowledged that he had obtained work three days a week as a driver.

The SCT also took into account the evidence of medical practitioners that the 46-year-old policeman could no longer work in law enforcement but, over time, might be able to return to work in some other calling.

However, it was the question of the TPD definition that the SCT's approach proved crucial.

The Tribunal determination noted the three key words in the insurance policy's TPD definition, namely: "unlikely", "ever", and "gainful profession, trade or occupation".

It said these keywords were to be interpreted as: ‘unlikely' — "meaning a probability of less than 50 per cent"; ‘ever' — "the decision maker is required to look well into the future"; ‘gainful profession, trade or occupation' — "part time work will satisfy, so long as it is remunerative and regular".

The determination stated: "when the key words are considered in conjunction with the medical evidence, the Tribunal does not believe it is possible to conclude that the Complainant, currently aged 46, satisfies the policy definition of TPD".

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Submitted by DOD on Thu, 06/16/2016 - 14:10

Clearly the right decision, Who was the advisor who suggested to this guy that it was even worth making a claim? There are 'same occupation' type definitions available but of course that cover costs more.

Submitted by Pete Wincott |… on Thu, 06/16/2016 - 15:10

DOD ~ may I suggest t's likely there wasn't an adviser involved with this claim as it was most probably an Industry Super Fund group policy. Hence the value of having a trusted financial adviser regardless!

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

11 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

11 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

11 months 1 week ago

Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Co...

2 days ago

Demand from institutional investors was the main driver of growth in Australia’s responsible investment (RI) market in 2023, as the industry continued to gain momentum....

2 days ago

In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges....

2 days ago