Stapling a two-fold issue

10 August 2021
| By Chris Dastoor |
image
image
expand image

Underinsurance and lack of any coverage are two separate issues which will both result from stapling – but both will need to be to be fixed independently, according to MLC Life. 

Sean Williamson, MLC Life chief group insurance officer, said stapling was going to a be slow burn but it would not need changes made from day one. 

“There is a potential that some funds exclude some occupations and if an individual changes to one of those occupations then they may be without cover through no fault of their own and no disclosure,” Williamson said. 

“I think the industry will solve that issue, but it may not solve the issue Cbus is trying to push – when they do change roles that they receive insurance appropriate for their occupation. 

“The first issue is a deeper issue that people are left without cover, whereas the second issue is one that comes back to the level or type of cover.” 

Cbus and the CMFEU were among that voices that criticised stapling and said it would provide inadequate insurance coverage  for people who changed jobs. 

Insurers, trustees and funds had a role to play in getting around stapling, which Williamson said involved the entities being collaborative within that relationship. 

“Being very clear around the member journey, the points in time when they could be making insurance decisions, and trying to articulate the right information – it’s making sure that journey is clear,” Williamson said. 

“All insurers will invest more in digital assets, so if they are making those decisions digitally, then those journeys will be supplemented by education implemented into those portals.” 

When it came to pricing on group insurance, Williamson said most of the pressure was still upwards, and Protecting Your Super (PYS) and Your Future, Your Super (YFYS) would add to that upward pressure over the long-term. 

“We’re still seeing a lot of the regulatory changes have all had upward pressure on group premiums,” Williamson said. 

However, Williamson said the data showed the industry delivered value for money. 

“In terms of the system itself, 70% of all insurance premiums are funded through super and its 90% for group insurance [versus] 30% to 40% for retail,” Williamson said. 

“For me, it’s very customer-centric; when you look at it from a global perspective, 80% is quite high. 

“It’s the primary source in which people access life insurance in Australia and if that was removed then we would see a huge underinsurance issue. 

“It adds a lot of value for customers and without it a lot of customers wouldn’t have any superannuation or would struggle to make ends meet effectively.” 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

11 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

11 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

11 months 1 week ago

Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Co...

1 day 7 hours ago

Demand from institutional investors was the main driver of growth in Australia’s responsible investment (RI) market in 2023, as the industry continued to gain momentum....

1 day 7 hours ago

In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges....

1 day 8 hours ago