Superannuation trustees need to improve their life insurance offering for members following a review by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC).
The regulator undertook a review of 15 super trustees from a broad cross-section of fund types to identify whether funds could achieve better member outcomes by enhancing their life insurance arrangements following an earlier review in 2019.
This included ensuring they had robust systems, processes, and controls to effectively administer their insurance arrangements as well as reforms from the design and distribution obligations (DDO).
While ASIC identified some trustees had shown progress in their insurance offering, this was “not necessarily consistent” across the industry and trustees had not made “sufficient effort in all areas”.
It found:
ASIC commissioner, Danielle Press, said: “Insurance in superannuation provides a built-in safety net for millions of [Australians]. Superannuation trustees play a central role in deciding what life insurance is made available to their members and how it is provided.
“Whether it is default or optional insurance, we want fund members to have confidence that they are receiving value for the insurance they hold through their super and that they will be able to claim on it when they need to.
“I strongly encourage all trustees to commit to a thorough analysis of their insurance arrangements using the information and action points in ASIC’s report to identify where they fall short and address any gaps. Life insurers also need to play their part by working collaboratively with trustees to implement any improvements.”
The regulator had written to the trustees involved to provide feedback and also recommended key actions for trustees to make improvements.
The insurance company has joined this year’s awards as a principal partner.
The $135 billion fund has transitioned away from TAL Life Insurance following an “extensive tender process”.
The $80 billion fund is facing legal action over allegedly signing up new members to income protection insurance by default without active member consent.
In a Senate submission, the Financial Services Council has once again called for further clarification that the government will assess the consumer outcomes of group insurance against the enshrined objective of superannuation.
So legislation weakens insurance for super fund members, many are excluded by age and account balance limits, advisers are totally excluded from providing education and assistance through 'intra-fund' advice, the insurers lose revenue and therefore profitability and potentially sustainability, then ASIC says they have to do better?
How can you expect anyone to do better when it is legislated that they have so many hurdles to jump, lower revenues, increased admin costs etc.....