Accountants seek voice in retirement advice provision

30 May 2019
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

Accountants have sought a place at the table when the Government initiates a review of the retirement income system, suggesting an essential element is proving access to affordable financial advice.

The Institute of Public Accountants (IPA) has welcomed a recent announcement by the Treasurer, Josh Frydenberg that he will be commissioning a review of the retirement income system which will be inclusive of the interfaces between superannuation, government pensions and taxation.

Commenting on the move, IPA chief executive, Andrew Conway said the review was long overdue in circumstances where there was no well-defined view on what a retirement living standard should look like.

“There is also the budgetary considerations of funding the age pension and superannuation tax concessions and ensuring that the system is sustainable going forward,” he said.

“The need to encourage greater investment in superannuation to facilitate self-funded retirement is critical as Australia will not be able to fund government pensions in the future, especially considering our ageing population,” Conway said. “Different mechanisms need to be considered given the longevity risk when superannuation members retire.  This includes the development of annuity type products.”

However, he said there was significant complexity in the system with many competing interests, which all needed to be given due weight if Australia was to develop an equitable retirement income system.

“For instance, we cannot ignore the findings of the Productivity Commission report which suggested reforms to benefit members through lower fees and higher investment returns could generate an extra $533,000 for a new job entrant today when they eventually retire,” Conway said  

 “An essential element of this review will be to provide access to affordable financial advice, which is what public accountants, as trusted advisers, can deliver,” he said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Submitted by Bear on Thu, 05/30/2019 - 16:29

Ok, so the few hundred Accountant/Financial Advisers I saw in my compliance days simply opened SMSF for the audit fees etc then put the clients in a Wrap platform. So two layers of fees equalled about 10k in extra platform fees over using direct wholesale funds and shares. only done to get credits/money from the Dealer group... No client first in that model..

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

11 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

11 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

11 months 1 week ago

Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Co...

1 day 9 hours ago

Demand from institutional investors was the main driver of growth in Australia’s responsible investment (RI) market in 2023, as the industry continued to gain momentum....

1 day 9 hours ago

In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges....

1 day 10 hours ago