Goal of Age Pension needs to be determined: Actuaries Institute

13 February 2020
| By Jassmyn |
image
image
expand image

The objective of the Age Pension needs to be determined before the retirement income system objective is determined, according to the Institute of Actuaries of Australia.

A key issue, it said in its submission to the Retirement Income Review, was to determine whether the Age Pension was a safety net or a guaranteed pillar that all retirees could depend on and build their retirement income plans around.

“On the one hand, there is a belief that the Age Pension is an entitlement, but on the other, there is a belief among younger generations that the Age Pension may not be there when they retire,” the submission said.

“Ideally, every Australian should have a confident answer to the question ‘what total income can I rely on receiving in retirement’.”

The submission noted that accumulation-based superannuation put inflation, investment, longevity, expense and other risks into the individual’s hands. In some cases, it said, there was a real risk that the Age Pension plus an individual’s super savings might not be sufficient to provide an adequate retirement income.

“Going forward, universal coverage for all workers should be a goal of the superannuation guarantee [SG] system whether people are employees, self-employed, or participate as part of the growing gig economy,” it said.

“Without this coverage, the only fall-back people will have where they have no made private provision, will be the Age Pension. This cost will be borne by all taxpayers, including those that saved through the SG and other voluntary savings.”

The submission also pointed to the benefits of pooling to spread longevity risk, reduce the risk burden on individuals and fall-back mechanisms (Age Pension). However, pooling could result in a faster drawdown of retirement incomes, increasing Government pension payments.

“Consequently, pooling will have an impact on the sustainability of the system,” it said.

The institute’s modelling found that retirement incomes had the potential to increase by 15-30% by combining an account-based pension with products that ensured (i.e. pool) longevity risk.

“…pooling may come at some additional cost in terms of reduced flexibility, reduced withdrawal benefits and/or death benefits, additional costs to administer the pool and potentially distribution costs for the product,” it said.

“This uplift income comes form paying lower death benefits in retirement (other than to the member’s spouse) and a partial reduction in flexibility i.e. it ensures superannuation is better channelled towards retirement income.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

11 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

11 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

11 months 1 week ago

Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Co...

1 day 11 hours ago

Demand from institutional investors was the main driver of growth in Australia’s responsible investment (RI) market in 2023, as the industry continued to gain momentum....

1 day 11 hours ago

In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges....

1 day 12 hours ago