Retirement drawdown rules need to be better designed to ensure retirees are not too conservative in their spending, Willis Towers Watson believes.
The advisory firm’s head of retirement solutions, Nick Callil said the aim of the overall retirement income system needed to encompass age pension and related benefits, and compulsory and voluntary superannuation, rather than just looking at superannuation, to promote better integration.
Callil said in an analysis titled ‘Superannuation is for spending’ that often the amount taken into retirement acted as a “capital base” to generate investment earnings which could be spent but often remained untouched.
“Often there is an assumption (generally unspoken) that assets individuals have accumulated for retirement are not to be drawn down during the retirement years,” he said.
However, a “spend the income” mindset for most retirees was unrealistic.
“Living off the interest income from term deposits or the dividend income emanating from a share portfolio sounds attractive but for most retirees (who have little in the way of income-producing assets outside superannuation) this sort of strategy is unlikely to produce an income they might regard as adequate,” he said.
To create a more comprehensive aim of retirement income Callil said the industry and government needed to look at:
Speaking to Super Review, the $70 billion fund has unveiled its new solution to address the ‘cognitive load’ of retirement as members enter their golden years.
New research has suggested it’s time to reconsider the home as a fourth pillar of the retirement income system, alongside the age pension, superannuation, and voluntary private savings.
New research has revealed over 60 per cent of retirees believe their super fund offers retirement income products suitable to support their retirement lifestyle.
Some retirees are “needlessly” paying two sets of fees and often more tax than they need to, according to the industry body.