Super balances impacted by mortgage costs

6 March 2018
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The Government has been urged to consider exposing more of the family home to the Age Pension assets test, under a housing affordability research paper published by the Grattan Institute.

The Institute also suggested that the scale mortgage debt in Australia is now such that it is having impacts on the Australian superannuation system, with many older householders feeling the need to use some or all of their superannuation savings to pay down mortgage debt.

Among the range of remedies proffered by the Grattan Institute were proposed changes to the Age Pension assets test, which it claims would make pension arrangements fairer and contribute between $1 billion and $2 billion to the Budget.

“Under the current rules only the first $203,000 of home equity is counted in the Age Pension assets test, and the remainder is ignored,” the Grattan paper said. “Inverting this so that all of the value of a home is counted above some threshold – such as $500,000 – would be fairer, and contribute to the budget.”

“It would also encourage a few more senior Australians to downsize to more appropriate housing, although the effect would be limited given that research shows downsizing is primarily motivated by lifestyle preferences and relationship changes,” it said.

However, it said these considerations dwarfed the financial trade-offs between having more cash to spend, but a lower Age Pension.

 “According to surveys, no more than 15 per cent of downsizers are motivated by financial gain. Only one per cent of seniors listed the impact on their pension as their main reason for not downsizing,” the research paper said. “Stamp duty costs (which are analogous to the threat of losing pension entitlements) were a barrier for a further five per cent of those thinking about downsizing.”

“Again, the dominant rationale for this reform would be budgetary rather than housing affordability,” it said. “Many Age Pension payments are made to households that have substantial property assets. Half of the government’s spending on age pensions goes to people with more than $500,000 in assets.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

10 months 2 weeks ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

10 months 3 weeks ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

10 months 3 weeks ago

The fund’s inaugural chief retirement officer is looking to establish a new venture. ...

3 hours ago

The sovereign wealth fund remains cautious of the impact of high inflation as it announces a strong return in its latest update....

22 hours ago

In this latest edition, Anna Shelley, CIO at AMP, shares the fund’s approach to current market conditions and where it continues to uncover key opportunities....

23 hours ago