POWERED BY MOMENTUM MEDIA
Accountants hit ATO and funds on SMSF criticisms
|
Both the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) and other sectors of the superannuation industry have been responsible for much of the negative publicity that has impacted self-managed superannuation funds (SMSFs), according to the National Institute of Accountants (NIA).
In a submission to the Cooper Review, the NIA claimed the SMSF sector “has been subjected to much conjecture about poor compliance”.
“Some of this has originated from other sectors of the superannuation industry and some of it comes from the ATO's own comments on compliance — where it has extrapolated data of non-compliance from targeted activities (targeting suspected non-compliers) with the overall performance of the SMSF sector,” the submission said.
However, it claimed that a summary of data on SMSF compliance provided by the Cooper Review had shown that the rate of non-compliance is not statistically different from other superannuation sectors.
“While it is important that there is appropriate compliance review procedures by the ATO, particularly in the form of targeted compliance programs, we do not believe the case has been made for an increase in compliance activity,” the NIA submission said. “Therefore, while the ATO should be provided with some additional resources to target SMSF compliance, we do not see the need for a large increase in such activities.”
The NIA said a number of its members subjected to ATO reviews of SMSFs had complained about the level of training of ATO staff.
“Many of the findings of such reviews have been appealed and on many occasions the tribunals and courts have found the ATO processes wanting and staff knowledge of this complex area insufficient,” the submission said. “It is costly to members to appeal these reviews and where the ATO has been found to be negligent or ‘reckless’ then there should be compensation to the taxpayer.
“Further, the ATO needs to ensure that its employees who undertake the reviews are both better trained and have a less confrontational and suspicious attitude towards SMSFs,” the NIA said. “Members have reported that ATO staff seem excessively zealous in seeking to uncover minor deficiencies. The ATO needs to deal with this issue through better training and better selection of staff who undertake the reviews.”
AUTHOR
Mike Taylor
Recommended for you
The impact of identity theft and its threat to superannuation savings were highlighted in a case that went before the Federal Court at the end of 2023.
A recent NSW Supreme Court decision is an important reminder that while super funds may be subject to restrictive superannuation and tax laws, in essence they are still a trust and subject to equitable and common law claims, says a legal expert.
New research from the University of Adelaide has found SMSFs outperformed APRA funds by more than 4 per cent in 2021–22.
The SMSF Association has made a number of policy recommendations for the superannuation sector in its pre-budget submission to the government.
TOP PERFORMING FUNDS
ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
Spire Oaktree Opportunities XI Second Close
61.07 3 y p.a(%)
2
Spire Oaktree Opportunities XI First Close USD
59.21 3 y p.a(%)
3
DomaCom Lot 21 Chellaston Road Munno Para West SA 5115 Australia
31.56 3 y p.a(%)
4
Fidante Credit Suisse Global Private Equity
31.06 3 y p.a(%)
5
DomaCom 4/27 Crombie Avenue Bundall QLD 4217 Australia
26.81 3 y p.a(%)
