ASIC removes minimum threshold from SMSF guidance

9 December 2022
| By Laura Dew |
image
image
expand image

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has decided to remove a $500,000 as an indicator of the ‘appropriateness of advice’ to establish a self-managed superannuation fund.

In updated guidance to SMSF advice, the regulator opted to no longer nominate a minimum threshold.

It did point out that fund expenses were proportionally higher for an SMSF and net returns were lower for low-balance funds.

SMSF Association deputy chief executive and director of policy & education, Peter Burgess, said the move was a “significant breakthrough” and followed research by the University of Adelaide that there was no material difference in performance for SMSFs between $200,000 and $500,000.

He said: “In particular, references in ASIC INFO 206 to SMSFs with balances below $500,000 as having lower investment returns and will often be uncompetitive compared with APRA-regulated funds was at odds with the findings of the University of Adelaide research conducted on a sizeable proportion of the SMSF sector.

“It’s worth repeating that the University of Adelaide research found no material differences in performance patterns for SMSFs between $200,000 and $500,000, so the notion that smaller SMSFs in this range deliver materially lower investment, on average, than larger SMSFs in this range is not supported by the research. The research shows that a more appropriate threshold is $200,000.

“So, it’s extremely pleasing that the regulator has taken heed of this research and our representations on this issue and has removed references to the $500,000 threshold.”

However, he noted SMSFs which were less than $200,000 were likely to achieve considerably lower net investment returns than those with a higher volume of assets.

Burgess also welcomed ASIC’s comments about the need for advisers to have specialist knowledge about SMSFs.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

11 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

11 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

11 months 1 week ago

Westpac has delayed its rate cut forecast, aligning with its peer NAB’s outlook on the likely trajectory for the Reserve Bank of Australia’s cash rate....

6 hours ago

The government’s adjustment to the Future Fund’s mandate could set a dangerous precedent, warns an economist, raising concerns that it may pave the way for problematic fu...

5 hours ago

The proposed reforms have been described as a key step towards delivering better products and retirement experiences for members, with many noting financial advice remain...

7 hours ago