The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has fired a warning shot over the bows of super funds over compliance issues, including suggesting that some self-managed investment options offer the same flexibility and control as a self-managed superannuation fund (SMSF).
In an overview of compliance issues released today, ASIC nominated the notable areas of concern for superannuation fund trustees as including:
Commenting on the findings, ASIC deputy chairman, Peter Kell said the regulator was reminding superannuation trustees that when developing and implementing strategies designed to gain and retain fund members, they should be mindful of the financial services laws and ensure that any communications to new or existing members were not misleading or deceptive.
"Some licensees who are trustees also need to ensure they keep up to date with recent legislative changes under the ‘Stronger Super' reforms. This includes the new requirements to disclose executive officer remuneration and systemic transparency, but also the new arrangements for complaints handling," he said.
The impact of identity theft and its threat to superannuation savings were highlighted in a case that went before the Federal Court at the end of 2023.
A recent NSW Supreme Court decision is an important reminder that while super funds may be subject to restrictive superannuation and tax laws, in essence they are still a trust and subject to equitable and common law claims, says a legal expert.
New research from the University of Adelaide has found SMSFs outperformed APRA funds by more than 4 per cent in 2021–22.
The SMSF Association has made a number of policy recommendations for the superannuation sector in its pre-budget submission to the government.