Call for SMSF presence in infrastructure sector

11 October 2012
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

Self-managed super funds (SMSFs) should be compelled to put some money into the country's infrastructure assets, according to chairman of retirement income at Challenger, Jeremy Cooper.

Cooper said it would be in the national interest if the superannuation system and the country's infrastructure needs were better married together through directed investment - but that SMSFs needed to pull their weight.

"One of the most crying areas of concern is that the self-managed sector that is currently worth around $440 billion dollars and growing, its exposure to infrastructure is about zero and someone's got to work out a way of getting some of that money into well-managed, conflict-free and highly diversified infrastructure," he said.

Panelists were discussing directed investment at the Financial Services Institute of Australasia conference in Sydney.

QSuper head of funds management Charles E. Woodhouse said the Australian superannuation industry were "natural owners" of infrastructure.

He said although fund managers often had a private equity style, if super funds spent a lot of time negotiating their alignment, directed investment had its advantages.

"The Australian superannuation industry is large and growing and we can potentially be very long-term holders of good businesses…our timeframes can be very closely aligned to the vendor's timeframes," he said.

However he said economic woes overseas were slowing QSuper's acquisition of new assets. 

Troy Rieck, managing director, QIC Capital Markets questioned what the impact of global low yields would be on illiquid assets. He said infrastructure was not an asset that could be unwound easily.

The biggest risk with directed investment was that political risk had become a real thing in terms of economics and finance: insurance premiums were not guaranteed and big pools of retirement savings looked appealing to governments in times of need, according to Rieck. 

"The superannuation industry looks like a honey pot and for the politicians desperate for money; directed investment becomes a real risk for the industry," he said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

11 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

11 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

11 months 1 week ago

Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Co...

1 day 18 hours ago

Demand from institutional investors was the main driver of growth in Australia’s responsible investment (RI) market in 2023, as the industry continued to gain momentum....

1 day 18 hours ago

In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges....

1 day 19 hours ago