Don’t compare SMSFs with other super sectors: SPAA

16 January 2014
| By Malavika Santhebennur |
image
image
expand image

The SMSF Professionals' Association of Australia (SPAA) has argued it is futile comparing self-managed super funds (SMSFs) with other superannuation sectors.

Director, technical and professional standards at SPAA Graeme Colley said SPAA had always argued against such comparisons — and the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) had proved SPAA's point.

"The ATO specifically states that comparing the investment performance between SMSFs and other types of superannuation funds are fraught with danger. While methodologies may be comparable, the data collected from the different types of funds is not the same," he said.

"It's similar with fees. Comparing the operating expenses of SMSFs with other types of superannuation funds is difficult. While the ratios used in the ATO statistics may be comparable, the data collected from the different types of funds is not the same."

Comparing SMSFs with other sectors is not a "like-with-like" comparison, he said.

Colley argues that SMSFs are tightly regulated and the regulator scrutinises it closely since it is managed by individuals, whereas other funds have prudential systems in place.

SPAA recently said super funds should be guarded on their commentary on self-managed super funds (SMSFs) after Media Super was fined $10,200 for misleading advertising using such a comparison.

He said people should get objective and impartial advice from experts on the superannuation industry.

The expense ratios of SMSFs are about 0.56 per cent in the 12 months to 30 June 2012, falling from 0.69 per cent to 0.56 per cent over the five years to 2012.

"This decrease reflects the increase in the asset sizes of SMSFs over the period as well as increased competition in the market for audit, accounting and administration services for SMSFs. Average operating expenses have increased over the same period and are estimated to be $5600," Colley said.

"Due to the fixed costs of operating a fund, SMSFs with lower balances have higher average expense ratios — 9.5 per cent with SMSFs with a balance of $50,000 compared to less than 1 per cent for SMSFs with assets of more than $500,000."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

11 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

11 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

11 months 1 week ago

Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Co...

2 days 3 hours ago

Demand from institutional investors was the main driver of growth in Australia’s responsible investment (RI) market in 2023, as the industry continued to gain momentum....

2 days 3 hours ago

In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges....

2 days 4 hours ago