Peter Townsend
|
Reform to self-managed super funds (SMSF) could cause greater complications in the sector, according to Townsend Business & Corporate Lawyers principal Peter Townsend.
In his response to the Cooper Review's examination of the SMSF industry and the issues surrounding the self-management of funds, Townsend stressed the importance of maintaining the status quo by continuing to allow all members to have a say in how a fund is run. However, he did highlight the need for trustees to be better educated about what to look out for when managing a fund.
In its review into the superannuation system, Phase III of the Cooper Review asked whether the current trust model is appropriate for SMSFs and if the model worked effectively for single-member SMSFs. It also asked whether the responsibilities of SMSF trustees for managing their funds' affairs should be less onerous than for trustees of super funds regulated by the Australian Prudential Regulation Association.
Responding the points 17.1 and 17.2 of the Cooper Review inquiry, Townsend said questions raised about the current SMSF model and the responsibilities held by members and trustees should not be changed.
"The member also being trustee is a sound model and it works. Look at the excellent compliance figures for SMSFs. Self-managed super is designed for closely-held groups — families, in fact. Rather than set a numerical limit, self-managed super should be available to all members of a family who want to operate their super together. All members should be trustees and have an equal say in how the fund is operated."
Townsend added that any changes to the current model could prove detrimental and cause problems in the long term. He questioned the merit of making SMSFs more complicated to run by having some members who are just members. This would likely make life harder for the adviser, and it could lead to more legal action from members who are not consulted about decisions made for the fund. It would also mean that some family members could dominate others in the fund."
Townsend added that while the current model worked well, trustees should be better educated about what they need to do when it comes to managing super funds, and what they should be looking for in a professional adviser. But he warned that the focus should not be to turn trustees into superannuation experts. Instead, the onus should be on placing them in a better position to choose quality advisers.
The impact of identity theft and its threat to superannuation savings were highlighted in a case that went before the Federal Court at the end of 2023.
A recent NSW Supreme Court decision is an important reminder that while super funds may be subject to restrictive superannuation and tax laws, in essence they are still a trust and subject to equitable and common law claims, says a legal expert.
New research from the University of Adelaide has found SMSFs outperformed APRA funds by more than 4 per cent in 2021–22.
The SMSF Association has made a number of policy recommendations for the superannuation sector in its pre-budget submission to the government.