Managed funds offering infrastructure assets are only a part of the answer for self-managed superannuation funds (SMSFs) seeking to make infrastructure investments, according to SMSF Association chief executive, Andrea Slattery.
Slattery has used a column published by AMP Capital to follow up on her organisation's submission to the Financial Systems Inquiry (FSI) urging changes to the regulatory settings to allow SMSFs to more easily directly invest in infrastructure projects.
"Those who argue managed funds offer infrastructure assets for the retail market must accept this is only part of the solution," she said.
"It overlooks the fact that [SMSF] trustees prefer to invest directly."
As well, Slattery cautioned that losses incurred by managed funds in the wake of the global financial crisis (GFC) had left trustees wary about the managed fund investment structure.
"Politicians and the industry need to bring some ingenuity to this issue, because it is hard to see the downside," she said.
"SMSF trustees want yield, and have the investment acumen to understand this asset class. On the other side of the ledger, Australia needs capital for infrastructure, and to effectively exclude a $590 billion pool seems short-sighted, to say the least. It's an issue the incoming government must address and engage on with the industry."
The impact of identity theft and its threat to superannuation savings were highlighted in a case that went before the Federal Court at the end of 2023.
A recent NSW Supreme Court decision is an important reminder that while super funds may be subject to restrictive superannuation and tax laws, in essence they are still a trust and subject to equitable and common law claims, says a legal expert.
New research from the University of Adelaide has found SMSFs outperformed APRA funds by more than 4 per cent in 2021–22.
The SMSF Association has made a number of policy recommendations for the superannuation sector in its pre-budget submission to the government.