The Government’s 2016 Budget changes to superannuation have proved negative for the self-managed superannuation fund (SMSF) sector, according to specialist SMSF administrator, Class Super.
Class Super chief executive, Kevin Bungard has told the company’s annual general meeting, that the immediate impact of the Budget super reforms proved to be negative, giving rise to six months of uncertainty followed by larger than expected and rapid changes and a decline in SMSF establishments.
He said SMSF establishments had, in fact, declined to their lowest level in five years.
Bungard said that the firm had also been impacted in the June and September quarter as firms delayed the loading of funds or deferred their move to the cloud.
He added that the company believed the second quarter was the “calm before the form” and that there was a second wave of super reform that would impact the third and fourth quarters.
“We believe that impact will be bigger than last year, and we expected for many firms this has the potential to push their move to the cloud out to the first quarter of financial year 2019,” Bungard said.
The impact of identity theft and its threat to superannuation savings were highlighted in a case that went before the Federal Court at the end of 2023.
A recent NSW Supreme Court decision is an important reminder that while super funds may be subject to restrictive superannuation and tax laws, in essence they are still a trust and subject to equitable and common law claims, says a legal expert.
New research from the University of Adelaide has found SMSFs outperformed APRA funds by more than 4 per cent in 2021–22.
The SMSF Association has made a number of policy recommendations for the superannuation sector in its pre-budget submission to the government.