POWERED BY MOMENTUM MEDIA
Property spruiker found to give unlawful SMSF advice
The Supreme Court of NSW has found Park Trent Properties Group unlawfully carrying a financial services business for over five years.
The property spruiker was found to provide advice to clients to purchase investment properties through a self-managed super fund (SMSF).
In November 2014, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) launched legal proceedings and by the time of the trial in June 2015, the firm had advised over 860 members of the public to establish and switch funds into an SMSF.
Handing down his judgement, his Honour Acting Justice Sackville said the business model depended on "persuading relatively unsophisticated investors of the virtues of using their superannuation accounts to purchase investment properties and to establish SMSFs".
"Investors were influenced to make important decisions concerning their superannuation strategy with little or no genuine consideration of whether the decision took proper account of their individual financial circumstances. Some suffered financial loss as a consequence," he said.
Sackville also referred to the firm's chief executive's, Ronald Cross, role as a "willingness to ignore legal advice as to the nature of Park Trent's statutory obligations".
He said the decision served as a warning to others who seek to influence clients to establish SMSFs for investment purposes, without having the necessary licence.
ASIC deputy chairman, Peter Kell, said "Property spruikers who recommend people invest in property via SMSFs, or facilitate such an investment, and who do not have an Australian financial services licence are breaking the law".
"It is important that advisers who deal with SMSFs are appropriately licenced because the important safeguards and standards that come with being licenced are in place for a sector which is of growing importance to more Australian investors," Kell said.
Recommended for you
The impact of identity theft and its threat to superannuation savings were highlighted in a case that went before the Federal Court at the end of 2023.
A recent NSW Supreme Court decision is an important reminder that while super funds may be subject to restrictive superannuation and tax laws, in essence they are still a trust and subject to equitable and common law claims, says a legal expert.
New research from the University of Adelaide has found SMSFs outperformed APRA funds by more than 4 per cent in 2021–22.
The SMSF Association has made a number of policy recommendations for the superannuation sector in its pre-budget submission to the government.
TOP PERFORMING FUNDS
ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
Spire Oaktree Opportunities XI Second Close
61.07 3 y p.a(%)
2
Spire Oaktree Opportunities XI First Close USD
59.21 3 y p.a(%)
3
DomaCom Lot 21 Chellaston Road Munno Para West SA 5115 Australia
31.56 3 y p.a(%)
4
Fidante Credit Suisse Global Private Equity
31.06 3 y p.a(%)
5
DomaCom 4/27 Crombie Avenue Bundall QLD 4217 Australia
26.81 3 y p.a(%)
