Retail and self-managed superannuation funds are losing out again when listed companies raise capital as institutional investors are favoured, according to the SMSF Association.
Speaking on a webinar, the association’s chief executive, John Maroney, said the regulatory framework overseeing equity capital needed to be reformed to remove this anomaly in the capital markets.
He said this had happened post the Global Financial Crisis and it was happening again as companies looked to quickly raise capital as COVID-19 created economic uncertainty.
“It means retail and SMSF investors are disadvantaged twice. Not only are their shareholdings in these companies diluted, but they miss the opportunity to buy shares at prices that are often a hefty discount to the market price. Clearly, it’s not a level playing field,” he said.
Maroney said this was exacerbated this year when the corporate regulator and the Australian Securities Exchange announced on 31 March temporary emergency capital raising measures to help companies raise urgently needed capital, especially by allowing the 15% placement capacity to be lifted to 25%, a decision that disadvantaged existing retail shareholders. This measure was due to expire on 30 November 2020.
Also speaking, Wilson Asset Management chair and chief investment officer, Geoff Wilson, said following the GFC $30 billion was raised which was mostly by placements to wholesale investors at an average 17% discount to the market price.
“By our reckoning, the retail end of the market was short-changed by $6 billion. This was totally unacceptable and similar dilution and lack of retail access has been occurring this year,” he said.
Maroney said three steps that could be taken to level the playing field were:
The SMSF Association also said it believed a single digital retail platform that built on advancements in financial technology was a crucial step as it would create more efficient mechanisms for fund raising from SMSFs and other retail investors.
“Participants could register on the platform, helping facilitate an even quicker process for companies and brokers to access all shareholders. Not only would this be effective for capital raisings but may be useful for larger-scale infrastructure investments from which SMSFs are typically excluded,” he said.
The impact of identity theft and its threat to superannuation savings were highlighted in a case that went before the Federal Court at the end of 2023.
A recent NSW Supreme Court decision is an important reminder that while super funds may be subject to restrictive superannuation and tax laws, in essence they are still a trust and subject to equitable and common law claims, says a legal expert.
New research from the University of Adelaide has found SMSFs outperformed APRA funds by more than 4 per cent in 2021–22.
The SMSF Association has made a number of policy recommendations for the superannuation sector in its pre-budget submission to the government.