The SMSF Association has taken the Product Commission (PC) to task over the quality of the data it used its supplementary analysis on investment performance, arguing that it contains flaws which will need to be recognised in any final analysis.
The Association described data utilised by the PC as having “inherent weaknesses”.
In a submission filed with the PC, the SMSF Association said it believed the Commission’s final report would need to make the caveat that the data used for analysis around SMSF investment returns contained deficiencies.
“We also maintain our position that the Commission should not be making recommendations regarding SMSF establishment balances based on data which has inherent weaknesses,” he said.
However, the SMSF Association said it did believe the data confirmed that age was a factor in SMSF cost-effectiveness in circumstances where younger SMSFs had lower returns on assets and higher expense ratios.
“There is no doubt that SMSF expense ratios are much more clearly related to fund size than fund age, however, this does not mean that SMSF age is not important,” it said.
In doing so, the SMSF Association warned the PC against using flawed data to conclude that the age of a fund was not a significant factor in returns.
The impact of identity theft and its threat to superannuation savings were highlighted in a case that went before the Federal Court at the end of 2023.
A recent NSW Supreme Court decision is an important reminder that while super funds may be subject to restrictive superannuation and tax laws, in essence they are still a trust and subject to equitable and common law claims, says a legal expert.
New research from the University of Adelaide has found SMSFs outperformed APRA funds by more than 4 per cent in 2021–22.
The SMSF Association has made a number of policy recommendations for the superannuation sector in its pre-budget submission to the government.