POWERED BY MOMENTUM MEDIA
SMSF auditor loses appeal to ASIC regarding disqualification
The Federal Court has set aside an earlier decision by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) to overturn the disqualification of a self-managed super fund (SMSF) auditor.
The decision, Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Gilliland, had looked into the disqualification of John Gilliland for breaching independence requirements.
In 2018, the Queensland-based auditor had been disqualified by ASIC upon finding he breached his duties by auditing the Fiscal Consultants Superannuation Fund (FCSF) from 2013 to 2015 while Gilliland, his wife, and his daughters were members and trustees of the super fund.
He stepped down in 2016, but was reported by the Australian Tax Office (ATO) to ASIC during a review of Gilliland’s audits that year.
He sought a review of the decision by the AAT, which set aside the decision, and ASIC subsequently appealed to the Federal Court.
The Court found deterrence was a relevant consideration in deciding whether to disqualify a person as an approved SMSF auditor under section 130F of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (Cth) and that the AAT had not considered general deterrence when making its decision.
Gilliland had practiced as a registered tax agent since 1978. He was first registered as an approved SMSF auditor in 2013.
He would be disqualified as an SMSF auditor again, pending a final decision by the AAT who would have to re-determine the matter.
AUTHOR
Rhea Nath
Rhea L Nath is a journalist on Super Review and InvestorDaily, with a focus on funds management, superannuation, and institutional investment. Previously, she covered small business and entrepreneurship news at Dynamic Business and multicultural issues at Indian Link Media Group. In 2022, she was named Young Journalist of the Year at the NSW Premier’s Multicultural Communications Awards.
Recommended for you
The impact of identity theft and its threat to superannuation savings were highlighted in a case that went before the Federal Court at the end of 2023.
A recent NSW Supreme Court decision is an important reminder that while super funds may be subject to restrictive superannuation and tax laws, in essence they are still a trust and subject to equitable and common law claims, says a legal expert.
New research from the University of Adelaide has found SMSFs outperformed APRA funds by more than 4 per cent in 2021–22.
The SMSF Association has made a number of policy recommendations for the superannuation sector in its pre-budget submission to the government.
TOP PERFORMING FUNDS
ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
Spire Oaktree Opportunities XI Second Close
61.07 3 y p.a(%)
2
Spire Oaktree Opportunities XI First Close USD
59.21 3 y p.a(%)
3
DomaCom Lot 21 Chellaston Road Munno Para West SA 5115 Australia
31.73 3 y p.a(%)
4
Fidante Credit Suisse Global Private Equity
30.15 3 y p.a(%)
5
DomaCom 4/27 Crombie Avenue Bundall QLD 4217 Australia
26.71 3 y p.a(%)
