POWERED BY MOMENTUM MEDIA
SMSF trustees to take care with new borrowing rules
Self-managed super fund (SMSF) trustees need to be aware of new limited recourse borrowing arrangements effective from 7 July, 2010, according to the Self Managed Super Funds Professionals' Association of Australia (SPAA).
The requirement for borrowed funds to be used to obtain a "single acquirable asset" and the restrictions imposed on replacing or improving the asset once it has been acquired are the most significant, according to SPAA national technical director Peter Burgess.
Previously, more than one asset could be acquired and assets did not have to be the same form or type in order to undertake a single limited recourse borrowing arrangement, according to SPAA.
"The changes mean separate borrowing arrangements must be in place for shares in different companies or even different classes of shares in one company, with compliance potentially messier than when dealing with property," Burgess said.
The acquisition of real property on separate titles also requires a separate borrowing arrangement to be put in place for each title, but where assets are inseparable they may be treated as one asset. As it is still unclear how this will be determined, SPAA believes advisers and trustees should act as if each title represents a separate asset, Burgess said.
Renovations or improvements will also not be permitted to properties for which limited recourse borrowing arrangements have been put in place as they may give rise to a different asset to the original one, regardless of the source of the funds used to renovate or improve the asset.
"In the context of real property, the inability to improve the asset during the life of the loan is a significant issue and extreme care should be exercised where it is the intention of a SMSF trustee to alter a property acquired under a limited recourse borrowing arrangement," Burgess said.
AUTHOR
Mike Taylor
Recommended for you
The impact of identity theft and its threat to superannuation savings were highlighted in a case that went before the Federal Court at the end of 2023.
A recent NSW Supreme Court decision is an important reminder that while super funds may be subject to restrictive superannuation and tax laws, in essence they are still a trust and subject to equitable and common law claims, says a legal expert.
New research from the University of Adelaide has found SMSFs outperformed APRA funds by more than 4 per cent in 2021–22.
The SMSF Association has made a number of policy recommendations for the superannuation sector in its pre-budget submission to the government.
TOP PERFORMING FUNDS
ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
Spire Oaktree Opportunities XI Second Close
61.07 3 y p.a(%)
2
Spire Oaktree Opportunities XI First Close USD
59.21 3 y p.a(%)
3
DomaCom Lot 21 Chellaston Road Munno Para West SA 5115 Australia
31.56 3 y p.a(%)
4
Fidante Credit Suisse Global Private Equity
31.06 3 y p.a(%)
5
DomaCom 4/27 Crombie Avenue Bundall QLD 4217 Australia
26.81 3 y p.a(%)
